Challenge-response sessions
Active sessions use bounded actions, deadlines and server-judged steps rather than accepting a client-declared liveness flag.
A selfie is evidence capture, not proof that a live person was present. A liveness workflow must issue a real challenge, evaluate the response, handle spoof/replay signals and store the provider-backed result.
Implementation and testing status is stated separately from commercial activation, so your team can evaluate what is genuinely available.
Active sessions use bounded actions, deadlines and server-judged steps rather than accepting a client-declared liveness flag.
Frame timing, near-replay hashes, subject consistency and failed/review states help prevent static or reused evidence from becoming approval.
Saved-document reuse supplies only eligible document evidence. It never stages or skips a new selfie and liveness sequence.
If the configured provider or evaluator is unavailable, the workflow remains unavailable or review-required instead of fabricating success.
General production ACTIVE liveness is off. The current pilot is sandbox-only. Worker challenge and anti-replay logic have synthetic integration evidence, but that is not real-provider acceptance and does not make paid liveness commercially ready.
No. A selfie is only an image. Liveness requires an actual challenge/evaluation and a provider-backed result.
No. Fresh selfie and liveness is a non-overridable invariant for saved-document reuse.
The flow fails closed or remains review-required. It does not return LIVENESS_APPROVED or claim a successful provider result.
Review the documentation, test the actual document and provider path, or ask our integration team for a scoped technical assessment.